Forex Megadroid Expert Advisor Real Review With Changed Settings

Forex Megadroid

I have written a review about the forex expert adviser “Forex Megadroid” earlier. The review contains the backtested results that were conducted by installing the expert advisor as it is with out changing any settings. You can find the review at http://www.forexbees.com/forex-megadroid-expert-adviser-real-review/. I have conducted another backtest by changing the settings and this review shows you what changes I have made and how this forex megadroid expert advisor is working with those changes. Again I have conducted the test on metatrader platform from ODLMarkets with a starting balance of $5000. I have used the same “Every Tick” model for testing this, which is the most precise method for testing any expert adviser. The results are quite impressive.

The following are the only changes I made.

1) I increased the LotSize from 0.1 to 0.2.

2) I increased the RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2.

I touched only the above settings. I did not touch any other settings like money management, slippage etc. I just left them as it is.

The tests are conducted again from years 2000 to 2009 and a final test is conducted for the whole length from 2000 to 2009. So lets review the results.

Year 2000:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2000 Graph with changing the lotsize and risk level to 0.2

Year 2000 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2000 Graph with Default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2000 Graph with Default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $8197. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $11059.95.

Year 2001:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2001 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2001 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2001 graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2001 graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $12128.25. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $25083.60.

Year 2002:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2002 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2002 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2002 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2002 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $10499.50. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $20035.80.

Year 2003:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2003 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2003 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2003 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2003 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $16019.60. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $40625.85.

Year 2004:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2004 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2004 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2004 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2004 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $14457.00. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $48517.25.

Year 2005:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2005 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2005 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2005 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2005 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $14622.70. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $36112.40.

Year 2006:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2006 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2006 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2006 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2006 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $9659.45. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $6600.25.

This is the only year where with changing the LotSize and Risk Level, it made less amount of money than with out changing the LotSize and RiskLevel. But the deposit is never lost and it still made some profit.

Year 2007:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2007 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2007 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2007 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2007 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $6521.00. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $7751.05.

Year 2008:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2008 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2008 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2008 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2008 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $10940.45 With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $18034.80.

Year 2009:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2009 Graph with changing LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2009 Graph with changing LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $11600.05. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $20026.30.

Year 2000 to 2009(Continuously Run):

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2000 to 2009 graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2000 to 2009 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Years 2000 to 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2000 to 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $6383712.55. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $42951494.60.

So overall this expert advisor is doing much better when the LotSize and RiskLevel are 0.2 than the default which is 0.1.

The following are the different years reports when the LotSize and the RiskLevel are 0.1(default) and 0.2(Changed).

VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Forex Boomerang Expert Advisor Real Review

Forex Boomerang Expert Advisor Review

This expert advisor says that it turns 10K Turns Into $453,258.28. It turns $500 into $308339.74. But if you see the results, they are only hypothetical results. That means this expert advisor is not run on a live account or a demo account for some time and no results were shown for this. Moreover the hypothetical results were given only from Jan 1st, 2008 to Oct 31st, 2008. There are no hypothetical results for previous years like for years 2007 or 2006 etc. There are no real or actual results are also given for this. There are no forex forum topics where I can see the reviews about this expert advisors.

When you search for “Forex Boomerang Expert Advisor Reviews” in google, it brings a lot of reviews and every review says the same thing that is mentioned on the original website. There are no forum topics where people discussed or are discussing about this expert advisor. For example all the reviews are saying “it turned out 10K into $500,000 in a year”. I think most of the reviews are made up by the expert advisor developers or the affiliate marketers who try to sell this product. There are some beta testers mentioned on the website but this is all made up. It is said that they are beta testers that means the software should have been given free to them for testing. But if you check the first beta testers reply (as they are saying that they are the actual replies from the BETA Testers) at the end of the reply you can see “P.S..there’s no damn way I want a refund. It would be a waste of time where I could be making money instead!!”. Why does anyone mention for a refund when the software is given free to them for testing?

Beta Tester 1 Reply As Mentioned On The Boomerang Website

Beta Tester 1 Reply As Mentioned On The Boomerang Website

I didn’t check any of the above before I buy it as I was not aware of the much of the things I have to check before buying an expert advisor. So I bought the expert advisor. If you want to know the things that you need to check before buying an expert advisor please read my article at

http://www.forexbees.com/forex-articles/things-watch-you-buy-expert-advisor

After buying the expert advisor I backtested it for the same time mentioned in their web site that is from Jan 1st, 2008 to Oct 31st, 2008. I got almost the same results as mentioned in their website. Check the following graph.

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2008 to Oct 31st 2008

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2008 to Oct 31st 2008

But when I backtested this for the year 2007, the following is the result. It sweeped the account. Check the graph.

forex boomerang backtested results graph from jan1st 2007 to dec 31st 2007

forex boomerang backtested results graph from jan1st 2007 to dec 31st 2007

The same is the result for different years. Check the following for different years.

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Nov 1st 2008 to April 21st 2009

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Nov 1st 2008 to April 21st 2009

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2006 to Dec 31st 2006

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2006 to Dec 31st 2006

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2005 to Dec 31st 2005

Forex Boomerang Backtested Results Graph From Jan1st 2005 to Dec 31st 2005

Yes this is boomerang. But it will hit you with a death blow by coming back to you. So my sincere advise is don’t buy this product.

VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)