Forex Megadroid Expert Advisor Real Review With Changed Settings

Forex Megadroid

I have written a review about the forex expert adviser “Forex Megadroid” earlier. The review contains the backtested results that were conducted by installing the expert advisor as it is with out changing any settings. You can find the review at http://www.forexbees.com/forex-megadroid-expert-adviser-real-review/. I have conducted another backtest by changing the settings and this review shows you what changes I have made and how this forex megadroid expert advisor is working with those changes. Again I have conducted the test on metatrader platform from ODLMarkets with a starting balance of $5000. I have used the same “Every Tick” model for testing this, which is the most precise method for testing any expert adviser. The results are quite impressive.

The following are the only changes I made.

1) I increased the LotSize from 0.1 to 0.2.

2) I increased the RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2.

I touched only the above settings. I did not touch any other settings like money management, slippage etc. I just left them as it is.

The tests are conducted again from years 2000 to 2009 and a final test is conducted for the whole length from 2000 to 2009. So lets review the results.

Year 2000:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2000 Graph with changing the lotsize and risk level to 0.2

Year 2000 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2000 Graph with Default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2000 Graph with Default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $8197. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $11059.95.

Year 2001:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2001 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2001 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2001 graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2001 graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $12128.25. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $25083.60.

Year 2002:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2002 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2002 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2002 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2002 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $10499.50. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $20035.80.

Year 2003:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2003 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2003 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2003 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2003 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $16019.60. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $40625.85.

Year 2004:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2004 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2004 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2004 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2004 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $14457.00. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $48517.25.

Year 2005:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2005 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2005 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2005 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2005 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $14622.70. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $36112.40.

Year 2006:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2006 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2006 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2006 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2006 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $9659.45. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $6600.25.

This is the only year where with changing the LotSize and Risk Level, it made less amount of money than with out changing the LotSize and RiskLevel. But the deposit is never lost and it still made some profit.

Year 2007:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2007 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2007 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2007 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2007 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $6521.00. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $7751.05.

Year 2008:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2008 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2008 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2008 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2008 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $10940.45 With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $18034.80.

Year 2009:

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2009 Graph with changing LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2009 Graph with changing LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Year 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $11600.05. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $20026.30.

Year 2000 to 2009(Continuously Run):

With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2:

Year 2000 to 2009 graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

Year 2000 to 2009 Graph with changing the LotSize and RiskLevel from 0.1 to 0.2

With default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1:

Years 2000 to 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

Year 2000 to 2009 Graph with default LotSize and RiskLevel which is 0.1

With default LotSize and RiskLevel the deposit of $5000 is grown to $6383712.55. With changing the LotSize and RiskLevel the deposite of $5000 is grown to $42951494.60.

So overall this expert advisor is doing much better when the LotSize and RiskLevel are 0.2 than the default which is 0.1.

The following are the different years reports when the LotSize and the RiskLevel are 0.1(default) and 0.2(Changed).

VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Forex Megadroid Expert Adviser Real Review

FOREX MEGADROID

Recently I have bought the expert advisor “Forex Megadroid“. I have backtested it to see how it is working. It is working good actually. The following is the review of this expert adviser.

I have tested this expert adviser for different years from 2000 to 2009 and for all these years it worked well. I have tested this for the whole length of time from 2000 to 2009 also and the results are given below. In all of my tests for different years it always showed profit.

One of the good thing I have seen in this expert adviser is the GMTOffset setting. I have seen some other expert advisers where you have to manually enter the GMTOffset which they don’t tell you what it is exactly. But for this expert adviser you can leave the default setting which is “0″. If you leave it, it will automatically calculate the GMT Offset for you. If you want you can change it also and test it.

Other good thing is the money management. It will automatically determine the number of lots that has to be traded and manage the money accordingly. If you want you can change this also and test it.

Another good thing is, for all of these years, any year you take the maximum number of consecutive losses are only 2 (for some of the years it is only 1).

Following are some of the points about this expert adviser.

1) This is for EURUSD only.

2) This is for hourly chart only.

3) Back tested results are given for this expert adviser in the expert adviser’s website http://forexmegadroid for the years from 2000 to 2009 but these backtested results my differ from the results you may see as the author of the web site is using metatrader from one particular broker and you may use a different broker’s metatrader platform.

The following are the conditions I have used for testing this expert adviser.

1) I have used $5000 as the initial deposit for testing.

2) The expert adviser is installed and tested as is and the settings were not changed. Tried to change the settings and test it but it is working for some years and for some years it’s not.

3) I used “Every Tick” model for testing this, which is the most precise method for testing any expert adviser.

4) The expert adviser is tested on ODLMarkets metatrader platform. But for a couple of years I tested it on other broker’s metatrader platforms like FXDD and AlpariUK and for whatever years I tested it worked for those also.

The following are the results for different years starting from 2000 to 2009. A final test is made for all the years starting from 2000 to 2009 and the results are shown at the bottom. The results are impressive.

Year 2000:

Year 2000 Results

Year 2000 Results

Year 2001:

Year 2001 Results

Year 2001 Results

Year 2002:

Year 2002 Results

Year 2002 Results

Year 2003:

Year 2003 Results

Year 2003 Results

Year 2004:

Year 2004 Results

Year 2004 Results

Year 2005:

Year 2005 Results

Year 2005 Results

Year 2006:

Year 2006 Results

Year 2006 Results

Year 2007:

Year 2007 Results

Year 2007 Results

Year 2008:

Year 2008 Results

Year 2008 Results

Year 2009:

Year 2009 Results

Year 2009 Results

Years from 2000 to 2009 (Continuously run):

2000 to 2009 Results Continuously Run

2000 to 2009 Results Continuously Run

The following are the reports that shows you all the trades that were taken by this expert adviser for different years from 2000 to 2009 and also the full report 2000 – 2009. Click on the following links to open them.

Year 2000 Report

Year 2001 Report

Year 2002 Report

Year 2003 Report

Year 2004 Report

Year 2005 Report

Year 2006 Report

Year 2007 Report

Year 2008 Report

Year 2009 Report

The following the report for 2000 to 2009 when the expert adviser is continuously ran from 2000 to 2009 and not for individual years.

Years 2000 to 2009 Report

VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 9.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)